The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Mason, 26 F.3d 134 (9th Cir. 1994):
The trial court is required to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the exact nature of the extraneous information upon learning of a possible incident of juror misconduct. United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d at 885. The trial judge is "uniquely qualified" to appraise the likely effect and prejudicial nature of extraneous information on the jury because he or she observes the jurors throughout the trial and hears the evidence presented. Id. Thus, "the judge's conclusion about the effect of the alleged juror misconduct deserves substantial weight." Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.