California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Sierra Club v. State Bd. of Forestry (Pacific Lumber Co.), 10 Cal.App.4th 349, 6 Cal.Rptr.2d 326 (Cal. App. 1992):
6 We are mindful that " '[t]he findings and the determination [of the administrative agency] come before the reviewing court with a strong presumption as to their correctness and regularity. Thus, it is presumed ... that the necessary facts to support the determination were ascertained and found, that the agency duly considered the evidence adduced at the administrative hearing, that official duty was regularly performed, and that the agency applied the proper standard or test in reaching its decision.' " (Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge Authority (1953) 40 Cal.2d 317, 330, 253 P.2d 659.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.