What is the test for determining whether a trier of fact could have reasonably deduced from the evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Deutsch, E061410 (Cal. App. 2016):
support of the judgment the trier of fact could have reasonably deduced from the evidence." [Citation.]' [Citation.] 'The question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the underlying enhancement beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citation.]" (People v. Hajek and Vo (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1144, 1197.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether there is substantial evidence by which a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
When a conviction for sexual assault is based primarily on circumstantial evidence, does the court have to presume every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant inquiry in determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge overturn a finding that the evidence supports a judgment the trier of fact could have reasonably deduced from the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
