What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review?

What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining whether a statute is constitutional or interpreted as a question of law? (California, United States of America)

Does a quasi-judicial review of the evidence presented to the trial court to determine whether any triable issues of fact were presented? (California, United States of America)

After reviewing the record of a motion brought by appellant in the Superior Court of Appeal against the appellant, what is the appellant's request for an independent review of the record? (California, United States of America)

When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for determining whether a physician is qualified to determine whether a plaintiff has a valid claim for medical malpractice? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's financial condition is to be considered a factor in determining whether to award punitive damages? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)

When an agency adopts a new interpretation of a statute and rejects an old interpretation of the statute? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a valid claim against a defendant who is not a plaintiff? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for determining whether a defendant's interpretation of the statute of limitations is correct? (California, United States of America)