The following excerpt is from Martin v. Am. Auto. Ass'n of N. Cal. Nev. & Utah, No. 2:15-cv-2496-TLN-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. 2016):
5. The court notes that plaintiff is not entitled to punitive damages based on her contention that defendant breached the terms of the insurance policy. Miller v. Nat'l Am. Life Ins. Co., 54 Cal. App. 3d 331, 336 (1976) ("Punitive damages are not available in an action in California based solely upon breach of a contractual obligation, even where the breach is intentional, willful, or in bad faith.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.