The following excerpt is from Doran v. Schweiker, 681 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1982):
Boyland v. Califano, 633 F.2d 430, 434 (6th Cir. 1980). See also Jones v. Harris, 629 F.2d 334, 336 (4th Cir. 1980) (the government's test directly contravenes the purposes of the Act "because the loss of small, regular contributions to a poor family would cause the economic dislocation the Act seeks to prevent").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.