California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rubio, B254665 (Cal. App. 2015):
"'"The defendant's intent and objective are factual questions for the trial court; [to permit multiple punishments,] there must be evidence to support [the] finding the defendant formed a separate intent and objective for each offense for which he was sentenced."'" (People v. Capistrano (2014) 59 Cal.4th 830, 886; People v. Coleman
Page 13
(1989) 48 Cal.3d 112, 162.) We therefore review the trial court's ruling on the issue under a substantial evidence standard. (People v. Johnson (1969) 270 Cal.App.2d 204, 208-209 [whether shot fired as defendants drove away was divisible from robberies is question of fact decided by trial court].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.