What is the test for determining whether a defendant has cumulative prejudicial effect on the outcome of a trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Topete, B288850 (Cal. App. 2020):
"There can be no cumulative error if the challenged rulings were not erroneous." (People v. Sedillo (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 1037, 1068; see also People v. Bradford (1997) 15 Cal.4th 1229, 1382 [finding that to the extent any errors occurred, they were minor and "[e]ven considered collectively" they did not result in prejudice].) As explained above, defendants have not shown cumulative prejudicial effect.
Page 30
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's age, education, physical condition, and mental health are factors used in determining whether they should be charged with assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an instructional error during a trial affected the outcome of the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's mental impairment is an impairment when determining whether he acted in imperfect or complete self-defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's first reaction to security measures at trial is prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal in determining whether a defendant received a fair trial due to a series of trial errors? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant's mental state was not a factor in determining whether they had committed a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's intent or mental state is a factor in determining whether they intended to commit an act of violence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a judge's comments were prejudicial to a defendant at trial? (California, United States of America)
