California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Suwannangkul, B285004 (Cal. App. 2018):
(People v. Daveggio (2018) 4 Cal.5th 790, 854.) A defendant is entitled to relief under state law if the defendant shows "'that the challenged conduct raised a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable verdict.' [Citation.] Under federal law, relief is not available if 'the challenged conduct was . . . harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citation.]" (Ibid.)
A prosecutor may not intentionally elicit inadmissible evidence from a witness. (People v. Trinh (2014) 59 Cal.4th 216, 248.) "'Such misconduct is exacerbated if the prosecutor continues to attempt to elicit such evidence after defense counsel has objected.'" (Ibid.)
1. Yelp Reviews on Top Thai
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.