The following excerpt is from Nozzi v. Hous. Auth. of L. A., No. 13-56223 (9th Cir. 2015):
12. As described in greater detail below, Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) requires courts, when determining what process is due to protect an interest covered by the due process clause, to examine (1) the private interest that will be affected by an official action; (2) the risk of erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value of additional or substitute safeguards; and (3) the government's interest, which includes the administrative burdens of additional or substitute procedures. Id. at 335.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.