The following excerpt is from Malmberg v. United States, Docket No. 14-3555-cv(L), Docket No. 14-3913-cv(XAP) (2nd Cir. 2016):
This sparse analysis by the district court provides little on which we may base our review, and thus fails as a matter of law. See Arpin v. United States, 521 F.3d 769, 776 (7th Cir. 2008) (noting that when a district court determines the amount of damages following a bench trial, "the judge must indicate the reasoning process that connects the evidence to the conclusion" (internal quotation marks omitted)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.