California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mehserle, 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 423, 206 Cal.App.4th 1125 (Cal. App. 2012):
We reject defendant's contention he was denied his right to present his defense. Generally, the exclusion of evidence on a minor or subsidiary point does not interfere with that constitutional right. ( People v. Cunningham (2001) 25 Cal.4th 926, 999, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 291, 25 P.3d 519.) Moreover, the record shows that defendant had ample ability and opportunity to present copious evidence, including his own testimony and that of experts, on his defense that he accidentally mistook his handgun for his taser.
[206 Cal.App.4th 1155]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.