85 To the same effect, see the comments of Dickson J. in Sorochan v. Sorochan, 1986 CanLII 23 (SCC), [1986] 2 S.C.R. 38 at 46, and of McLachlin J. in Peter v. Beblow, 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 at 990, where she identified, and later dismissed, the argument that services rendered in the role of wife and stepmother could not give rise to a claim in unjust enrichment because they arise from natural love and affection. She further said: It is at this stage [absence of juristic reasons for enrichment] that the court must consider whether the enrichment and detriment, morally neutral in themselves, are "unjust".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.