The principle that domestic services may ground a claim for unjust enrichment is well-established in Canadian law: see especially the discussion in Peter v. Beblow, 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980, 77 B.C.L.R. (2d) 1. However, the rendering of domestic services itself does not per se entitle a claimant to a proprietary interest in property. A party must demonstrate, both that there has been unjust enrichment and that a monetary remedy would be inadequate: Peter v. Beblow, supra, at ¶ 3, per McLachlin J.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.