California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mickle, 284 Cal.Rptr. 511, 54 Cal.3d 140, 814 P.2d 290 (Cal. 1991):
Defendant finally observes that some of the foregoing witnesses mentioned that defendant was reasonably "intelligent" and did not act in a "crazy" or "bizarre" fashion around the time of the prior or current crimes. Defendant insists such general character evidence was not admissible in the prosecution's case-in-chief. (People v. Boyd, supra, 38 Cal.3d 762, 775-776, 215 Cal.Rptr. 1, 700 P.2d 782.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.