What is the test for admissibility of a motion where a defendant has been found guilty of a charge of assault against an uncharged defendant?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lamas, F073362 (Cal. App. 2018):
We reach the same conclusion here. The trial court was not required to find the presumption in favor of admissibility was overcome. (See People v. Loy (2011) 52 Cal.4th 46, 62.) The uncharged acts were no more inflammatory than the charged offenses, the evidence was presented quickly and without irrelevant detail, and the uncharged acts were not remote in time. (See ibid.; People v. Wilson (2008) 44 Cal.4th
Page 20
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of Section 969a of the California Criminal Code when a jury has found a defendant not guilty of a charge of assault but found him guilty of the same charge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion for a retrial of a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of sexual assault and a similar charge against the same defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's recent finding that a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of perverting the course of justice in a sexual assault case has been found guilty of a similar charge in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal against his conviction for assault on a charge of assault against a defendant who pleaded guilty to the same charge? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found not guilty of a charge but found guilty of assault? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial on a charge of sexual assault brought by defendant Perez, who has pleaded not guilty to the charge, is the evidence insufficient to support his claim of insufficiency of evidence? (California, United States of America)
In arguing that the trial court abused its power to deny a motion to sever an indecent exposure charge from a sexual assault charge, does defendant rely on Earle v Earle to argue that the motion was abused? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a jury verdict in a motion where a defendant is found not guilty of assault but convicted of assault by reason of negligence? (California, United States of America)
What is the remedy used by a court to dismiss a charge of assault against a defendant who was found guilty of assault by reason of prejudice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a finding that a defendant has been found guilty of a charge of sexual assault against two different defendants? (California, United States of America)
