What is the test for abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Berry, B227545 (Cal. App. 2012):
A trial court has wide discretion to admit or exclude expert testimony. (People v. Valdez (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 494, 506.) We review the trial court's ruling for abuse of discretion. (People v. Mayfield (1997) 14 Cal.4th 668, 766.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the case law on abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for requiring expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of the exclusion of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for obtaining expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
