The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Quintanilla, 103 F.3d 143 (9th Cir. 1996):
We review the district court's evidentiary rulings, including the admission of witness statements, for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Warren, 25 F.3d 890, 894 (9th Cir.1994). In determining whether a non-constitutional error is harmless, we determine whether that evidence "more-probably-than-not materially affected the verdict." United States v. Dean, 980 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1992).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.