The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Agadaga, 19 F.3d 29 (9th Cir. 1993):
A district court's evidentiary rulings are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Meyers, 847 F.2d 1408, 1411 (9th Cir.1988). Erroneous evidentiary rulings will be reversed for an abuse of discretion only if such nonconstitutional error more likely than not affected the verdict. Id. at 1412.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.