The following excerpt is from Alaan v. Asset Acceptance LLC, CASE NO. 10cv328-WQH-BLM (S.D. Cal. 2011):
"Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Sch. Dist. No. IJ v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) (citations omitted).
Page 3
"The action upon an account stated is not upon the original dealings and transactions of the parties. It is upon the new contract by and under which the parties have adjusted their differences and reached an agreement.... [I]f in writing, it should appear to be something more than a mere memorandum and should show with clearness and certainty that it was intended to be a final settlement up to date. Whether these conditions exist is usually a question to be determined by the trier of fact from all the circumstances of the case, and in reaching that determination reasonable inferences can be drawn in support of the claim of either party if there is any credible evidence warranting such action." Fogarty v. McGuire, 170 Cal. App. 2d 405, 409 (1959) (citations omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.