The following excerpt is from Gibson v. Office of Attorney General, 554 F.3d 759 (9th Cir. 2009):
To state a claim against their government employer for violating the First Amendment, Plaintiffs must show (1) that they engaged in protected speech, (2) that the employer took an adverse employment action against them, and (3) that their speech was a substantial or motivating factor for the adverse action. Coszalter v. City of Salem, 320 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Cir.2003). The pivotal element in this case is the first one: whether Plaintiffs' speech
[554 F.3d 764]
was constitutionally protected. This inquiry presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Berry v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 447 F.3d 642, 648 (9th Cir.2006).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.