The following excerpt is from Espinoza v. United States, Case No.: 16-cr-1476-BEN, Case No.: 18-cv-1462-BEN (S.D. Cal. 2020):
Under section 2255, a movant is entitled to relief if the sentence: (1) was imposed in violation of the Constitution or the laws of the United States; (2) was given by a court without jurisdiction to do so; (3) was in excess of the maximum sentence authorized by law; or (4) is otherwise subject to collateral attack. 28 U.S.C. 2255; United States v. Speelman, 431 F.3d 1226, 1230 n.2 (9th Cir. 2005). If it is clear the movant has failed to state a claim, or has "no more than conclusory allegations, unsupported by facts and
Page 2
refuted by the record," a district court may deny a 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing. United States v. Quan, 789 F.2d 711, 715 (9th Cir. 1986). That is the case here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.