The following excerpt is from United States v. Lara-Caneda, Case No. 10CR3254-BTM (S.D. Cal. 2012):
A defendant may move to suppress evidence obtained through electronic surveillance "only if his privacy was actually invaded; that is, if he was a participant in an intercepted conversation, or if such conversation occurred on his premises." 18 U.S.C. 2518(10)(a) and 2510(11); United States v. King, 478 F.2d 494, 506 (9th Cir. 1973) (citing Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 176 (1969)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.