The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Carrillo, 947 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1991):
This court reviews a denial of a Rule 35(b) motion for abuse of discretion, United States v. Thayer, 857 F.2d 1358, 1359 (9th Cir.1988), or an abdication of discretion, United States v. Barker, 771 F.2d 1362, 1365 (9th Cir.1985). "The function of Rule 35(b) is 'simply to allow the district court to decide if, on further reflection, the original sentence now seems unduly harsh.' " United States v. Smith, 650 F.2d 206, 208 (9th Cir.1981) (quoting United States v. Maynard, 485 F.2d 247, 248 (9th Cir.1973)). A motion to reduce sentence under Rule 35(b) is therefore essentially a plea for leniency. Thayer, 857 F.2d at 1360; United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 859 (9th Cir.1982).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.