The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Sterling, 914 F.2d 1497 (9th Cir. 1990):
Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 292 (1983). The record discloses that the district court did in fact consider these factors carefully in the course of denying the defendant's motion to reduce sentence. The district court stated that it "had a substantial awareness of this particular defendant, [and] had concluded in the imposition of sentence that he should not be treated the way as any other defendant would be by averages." The sentence imposed was "simply a statement by [the] ... court that [Sterling] was a dangerous individual who should be incarcerated for a long period of time. And that's ... what the court intended to do and did."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.