What is the test for a jury to determine whether death is the appropriate penalty?

to abrogate their personal responsibility to determine the appropriate punishment" or "suggest to the jury that the responsibility for determining the appropriateness of the defendant's death rests elsewhere. " ( Sattiewhite , at p. 481, 174 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 328 P.3d 1.) The prosecutor merely told jurors that they "owe [them]selves and [others] the imposition of a just and appropriate punishment" and that a death verdict would be consistent with societal values. (See People v. Zambrano (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1082, 1179, 63 Cal.Rptr.3d 297, 163 P.3d 4 ["the community ... has the right to express its values by imposing the severest punishment for the most aggravated crimes"], disapproved on other grounds in People v. Doolin (2009) 45 Cal.4th 390, 421, fn. 22, 87 Cal.Rptr.3d 209, 198 P.3d 11.) And as in Sattiewhite , the court here instructed the jury to determine "individually" whether death is the appropriate penalty.