California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Silvas, B242738 (Cal. App. 2013):
"'An appellate court must accept logical inferences that the jury might have drawn from the evidence even if the court would have concluded otherwise. [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Halvorsen (2007) 42 Cal.4th 379, 419.) The appropriate test is
Page 5
not whether the evidence proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but whether the evidence supports the jury's conclusions. (People v. Wright (1985) 39 Cal.3d 576, 592.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.