California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Enborg, E054747 (Cal. App. 2013):
We recognize that defendant contends his kidnapping conviction should be reversed because the court should have instructed that false imprisonment is a lesser included offense of kidnapping. Because defendant was separately charged and convicted of false imprisonment based on the same conduct supporting the kidnapping conviction, and because false imprisonment is a lesser included offense of kidnapping, the People assert his false imprisonment conviction should be reversed. (People v. Binkerd (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 1143, 1147 ["A defendant cannot be convicted of both an offense and a lesser offense necessarily included within that offense, based upon his or her commission of the identical act."].) However, because there was sufficient evidence of kidnapping, no additional instruction on false imprisonment was required.
Page 9
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.