In those reasons he considered the decision of Master Powers (as he then was), in Wolansky v. Harlan (1992), 67 B.C.L.R. (2d) at 211 (S.C.) [Wolonsky], which held that a master did not have jurisdiction to require parties to sign extra-provincial authorizations but suggested that a judge of this court might be able to make such orders by the exercise of inherent jurisdiction.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.