California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Johnson v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 807 (Cal. App. 2016):
If the defendant challenges as vindictive a prosecutorial decision to increase the number or severity of charges following a successful appeal, the court must examine the prosecutor's actions in the context of the entire proceedings. If any objective event or combination of events in those proceedings should indicate to a reasonable minded defendant that the prosecutor's decision to increase the severity of charges was motivated by some purpose other than a vindictive desire to deter or punish appeals, no presumption of vindictiveness is created. (United States v. Krezdorn , supra , 718 F.2d at pp. 13641365.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.