In reviewing a decision by the Superior Court of Appeal to deny probation to a defendant who has committed a criminal offence, can the judge rely on another court's decision not to grant probation?

That another court may have reached a different conclusion does not demonstrate an abuse of discretion. In reviewing a trial court's denial of probation, " 'it is not our function to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. Our function is to determine whether the trial court's order granting [or denying] probation is arbitrary or capricious or exceeds the bounds of reason considering all the facts and circumstances.' " (People v. Weaver (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1311.) We cannot conclude the court's denial of probation was " 'arbitrary or capricious' " or that it exceeded " 'the bounds of reason.' " (Ibid.)