What is the test for a de novo claim that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the applicable principles of law?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Abbenhaus, E054111 (Cal. App. 2012):
"'We review de novo a claim that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the applicable principles of law.' [Citation.]" (People v. Canizalez (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 832, 850.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a claim that a trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the applicable principles of law? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the applicable principles of law? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim that a trial court failed to properly instruct on the applicable principles of law? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim that a court failed to properly instruct a jury on the applicable principles of law? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim that a court failed to properly instruct on the applicable principles of law reviewed de novo? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal claiming that he failed to raise his constitutional claims in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court properly instruct the jury on comparative negligence principles in a nuisance action where a defense claim is made that if the nuisance exists it arose because of negligence? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a claim that the trial court erred by failing to provide a written copy of the jury instructions? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct on the elements of rape and sodomy generally? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to the lesser included offense of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
