What is the test for a constitutional argument that someone has a constitutional right to participate in a peaceful protest?
"New York", United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Pettigrew, 332 N.Y.S.2d 33, 69 Misc.2d 985 (N.Y. Dist. Ct. 1972):
'Such an argument has as its major unarticulated premise the assumption that people who want to propagandize protests or views have a constitutional right to do so whenever and however and wherever they please. That concept of constitutional law was vigorously and forthrightly rejected [69 Misc.2d 994] in (the two Cox decisions).' (Adderley v. Florida, Supra, at pp. 47--48, 87 S.Ct. at p. 247).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for an argument that a person has a constitutional right to participate in a protest? ("New York", United States of America)
Does a civil rights complaint containing only allegations of personal participation in civil rights violations constitute "official personnel" or "personal participation"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any federal or statutory violation of a person's right to exercise their constitutional, statutory or constitutional right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is the need to train police officers in the constitutional limitations on the use of deadly force so obvious that failure to do so would constitute deliberate indifference to constitutional rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether prison officials were on actual or constructive notice that the risk to inmates' constitutional rights was substantially certain to result in a violation of their constitutional rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What constitutes a vested right or vested right? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the requirements for an amended complaint to identify as defendant only persons who personally participated in a substantial way in depriving a plaintiff of a federal constitutional right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a litigant who complains of a violation of a constitutional right have a cause of action directly under the United States Constitution? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no constitutionally protected right to a certain quality of housing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have a right to be free to exercise his constitutionally protected right to petition for redress? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
