The following excerpt is from Hines v. Sumner, 942 F.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1991):
Hines first asserts that he was deprived due process because of the state's delay in processing his state post-conviction remedies. We will not review this claim, however, because "a petition alleging errors in the state post-conviction review process is not adressable through habeas corpus proceedings." Franzen v. Brinkman, 877 F.2d 26 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 574 (1989).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.