The following excerpt is from Ebel v. City of Corona, 698 F.2d 390 (9th Cir. 1983):
The city's case will ultimately rest on proof of the likelihood of some harm that the ordinance was designed to prevent. At trial, the district court should make factual findings on the validity of the city's assertions of harm and then closely scrutinize the Corona ordinance's relationship to prevention of the alleged harms. Young v. American Mini Theaters, 427 U.S. at 56, n. 12, 96 S.Ct. at 2445, n. 12.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.