What is the sufficiency of evidence argument in the case of a minor in possession of a concealable weapon?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jorge P. (In re Jorge P.), F060915, Super. Ct. No. JJD062781 (Cal. App. 2011):
12101(a)(1) offense (minor in possession of a concealable weapon).3 We construe this to be a sufficiency of the evidence argument as to the existence of the element of appellant's status as a minor and conclude substantial evidence supports the juvenile court's implied finding of each element of count 2. (See People v. Lynch (2010) 50 Cal.4th 693, 759.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What evidence is sufficient to support a conviction for possession of a concealed concealed dirk or dagger? (California, United States of America)
Is it error to admit evidence that other weapons were found in the possession of a defendant's possession? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's argument that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for possession of drugs and possession of a firearm? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is sufficient evidence to have been sufficient evidence for a jury to find that defendant intentionally poisoned a patient? (California, United States of America)
Is constructive possession of a deadly weapon sufficient to establish a defendant was armed with the weapon for purposes of resentencing? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that Weizoerick and Ahlo opined the drugs were possessed for sale rather than personal use, rather than possession, are sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of a drug offence? (California, United States of America)
What is the defence argument on the sufficiency of evidence in the case of possession of small amounts of heroin? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that prior criminal activity was inadmissible as aggravating evidence for possession of a concealed weapon? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
