What is the statute of limitations for a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from De Edwards v. Escrow of the W., B249503 (Cal. App. 2014):
20. The closing occurred in June 2006. The complaint was filed four years later, in June 2010. Claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress are subject to a two-year statute of limitations. (Code Civ. Proc., 335.1; see Pugliese v. Superior Court (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 1444, 1450.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law that limits damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress to those who contemporaneously observe both the negligent act and the injury it causes? (California, United States of America)
What is the applicable statute of limitation for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim for emotional distress arising from an incident in which a patient suffered severe emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff include the taxi fare incident as support for his negligent infliction of emotional distress claim? (California, United States of America)
Is negligent infliction of emotional distress an ordinary cause of action for negligence? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress without showing any physical injury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a doctor's claim that he has stated a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between negligent misrepresentation and negligent infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress? (California, United States of America)
Does the statement of the tort itself, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, bring emotional distress within the ambit of the interests protected by the tort? (California, United States of America)
