What is the standard of review on a motion alleging juror misconduct?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Williams v. Albertson's LLC, B284651 (Cal. App. 2019):
"The standard of review on a new trial motion alleging juror misconduct is abuse of discretion." (Sarti v. Salt Creek Ltd. (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1187, 1213.) "To the extent that the trial court confronted conflicting declarations in denying the new trial
Page 9
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct based on Juror misconduct, what is the effect of the finding on the credibility of the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for finding substantial evidence to support a motion for a new trial motion based on juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
How should the Court of Appeal review the first-stage ruling of a motion to review the denial of Batson/Wheeler motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion to review a decision of a trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion for a new trial based on alleged juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion to amend a juror's notice of motion without meeting with the juror? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, what is the standard of review in the context of a motion for summary review of the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
