What is the standard of review of evidence in a personal injury case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Vang, C060682 (Cal. App. 2011):

The standard of review is, again, abuse of discretion; a trial court is vested with wide discretion in deciding the relevancy of evidence. (People v. Sassounian (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 361, 402.) And, again, there was no abuse of discretion here.

Other Questions


What is the standard of review in the context of the admission of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for admitting evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review that the court must apply when evaluating evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard practice for a defendant to file a petition for personal injury counsel in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review in a sexual assault case when the prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of Evidence Code section 664 of the California Evidence Code on the burden of proof in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What are some examples of high-profile personal injury cases involving personal injury? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, can a plaintiff hire an attorney to prosecute the personal injury suit? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.