What is the standard of review that the court must apply when evaluating evidence in a personal injury case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Arroliga, A126117, San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. SC067665 (Cal. App. 2010):

The standard of review that we must apply when evaluating this type of argument is settled. The trial court is granted broad discretion to determine whether to admit evidence under Evidence Code section 352, and its ruling will be reversed on appeal only where the court abused its discretion. (People v. Cain (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1, 33.) We find no abuse here.

Other Questions


How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts reviewed evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for admitting evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence in the context of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable in assessing whether instructions in a personal injury case apply to a defendant? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.