What is the standard of review for destroying evidence in bad faith?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Dominguez, B254240 (Cal. App. 2015):
not established that the prosecution team had destroyed the evidence in bad faith. Defendant argues that this ruling was erroneous. The standard of review for such claims is unsettled (People v. Velasco (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1258, 1262), but we reject defendant's claim even under a de novo review standard.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review for a finding as to whether evidence was destroyed in good faith or bad faith? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for destroying or destroying evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for destroying or destroying evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the standard of review in the context of a claim for insufficient evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence test in the review of a finding under the preponderance of the evidence standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a case where the evidence relied mainly on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review in a sexual assault case when the prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for insufficient evidence claims involving circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
