California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Torres v. Blankenship, E057465 (Cal. App. 2014):
Instead, the only issue for us to resolve is the propriety of the trial court granting defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings based on the one-year statute of limitations for attorney misconduct as it applies to plaintiff's cause of action for fraud. ( 340.6.) The standard of review is the same as for reviewing the sustaining of a general demurrer. We accept as true the properly-pleaded allegations of the complaintas well as any facts that may be judicially noticedto determine whether a complaint states, or
Page 7
may be amended to state, a valid cause of action. (Crowley v. Katleman (1994) 8 Cal.4th 666, 672.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.