What is the standard of review applicable to the subject matter jurisdiction under the Food Safety Administration Act?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Skanga Energy & Marine Ltd. v. Petroleos De Venezuela S.A., 12-2891-cv (2nd Cir. 2013):
"The standard of review applicable to district court decisions regarding subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA is clear error for factual findings and de novo for legal conclusions." Robinson v. Gov't of Malaysia, 269 F.3d 133, 138 (2d Cir. 2001)
Page 3
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When reviewing the dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, how do we review the factual findings and legal conclusions de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard for review of a district court's determination that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review for the purpose of determining an applicant's application for employment? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In reviewing the application of a sophisticated means enhancement, what is the difference between a de novo review and a clear error review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear a motion denying a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to the exercise of Ministerial or Administrative discretion? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review and what is the deference required to review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
