What is the standard for reviewing a court's findings of fact concerning value of property?
federal, United States of America
The following excerpt is from In re Kim, 205 BR 238 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1997):
The court's findings of fact concerning value are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard. In re Tuma, 916 F.2d 488, 490 (9th Cir.1990). The Panel must be left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed before a factual finding can be determined to be clearly erroneous. Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1511, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If a court finds that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue under a different legal standard than under the current standard of care, can the finding be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a district court's confirmation of an arbitral award, does the court need to review a finding of fact for "clear error"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a factual finding from a state court relevant to the federal court review if the relevant record is unavailable for review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When will the Court of Appeal review the findings of the District Court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for an application to compel the Court to approve the publication of both the findings of an independent review and the analysis of both findings? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, how do we review the findings of the previous district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts reviewed the findings of the Court of Appeal on jurisdictional issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
