What is the standard for determining whether defective notice is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from San Bernardino Cnty. Children & Family Servs. v. E.V. (In re I.V.), E075255 (Cal. App. 2020):
Several appellate courts have applied the harmless beyond a reasonable doubt standard of Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24, in determining whether defective notice requires reversal. (J.H., supra, 158 Cal.App.4th at p. 183; In re Justice P. (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 181, 183.)2
Page 15
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the federal harmless error standard for determining that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in the federal and state courts for determining whether a federal error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the "no reasonable possibility" standard and the "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt" standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for determining that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has a right to a jury determination based upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant's failure to instruct the jury on an element of the crime is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
