What is the standard for determining that no reasonable trier of fact could find a burglary allegation true beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. R.P. (In re R.P.), 2d Juv. No. B281836 (Cal. App. 2018):
could find the [burglary allegation true] beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citations.] [] This standard means that when an appellate court determines that the evidence was insufficient, it has concluded that no 'reasonable' trier of fact could have found the [allegation true beyond a reasonable doubt]." (People v. Guiton (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1116, 1126-1127.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant inquiry in determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there is substantial evidence by which a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
