What is the "single subject rule" applicable to initiatives?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Patterson v. Tehama County, 184 Cal.App.3d 1546, 229 Cal.Rptr. 696 (Cal. App. 1986):
10 The "single subject rule" applicable to initiatives (see Brosnahan v. Brown, supra, 32 Cal.3d at pp. 245-253, 186 Cal.Rptr. 30, 651 P.2d 274) is not at issue in this litigation.
11 These paragraphs provide:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is Proposition 8 a single subject subject to the single subject rule? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a single subject rule challenge to Proposition 115? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
Can the Attorney General's summary be struck down as violative of the single subject rule? (California, United States of America)
Does an employer need to clearly identify and attach the applicable rules to an employee's employment application? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the single subject rule? (California, United States of America)
Does Proposition 21 Violate the Single Subject Rule? (California, United States of America)
Is statutory language "does not more than codify a general rule of construction" applicable as well as codifying a general Rule of Construction? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the search rules in the context of a search warrant application? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of having an accomplice testify against a single defendant in a single criminal trial? (California, United States of America)
