What is the scope of consent to search, scope of search, and whether the trial court erred by denying suppression motion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Osuna, B271014 (Cal. App. 2017):
2. Appellant's counsel originally filed a brief in this matter pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. On October 5, 2016, we requested briefing on issues pertaining to consent to search, scope of consent, and whether the trial court erred by denying appellant's suppression motion. We have received and considered the parties' briefs.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred by denying a motion to suppress evidence found during a search of a van by law enforcement? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred by denying a motion to suppress evidence found during a search of a vehicle by law enforcement? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing an order denying a motion to suppress, does the court have any authority to review the fact finding of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial in a sexual assault case brought by Dimas, who is remanded on remand pending a retrial, what factors will the court consider in deciding whether to grant or deny the motion? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated a motion to suppress a search under the consent search term? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
