California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Buckels, B242631 (Cal. App. 2013):
Because the record indicates the trial court "misunderstood the scope of its discretion to impose concurrent sentences for defendant's current convictions, and erroneously believed consecutive sentences were mandatory," we vacate Buckels's sentence and remand the matter for a new sentencing hearing. (People v. Deloza, supra,
Page 9
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.