California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mendoza, F071822 (Cal. App. 2018):
Although respondent agrees that this amendment applies here, respondent opposes remand. Respondent contends the trial court would not have struck the firearm enhancement. (See People v. Gutierrez (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1894, 1896 [finding it unnecessary to remand matter for trial court to consider retroactive discretionary authority].) During sentencing, the trial court noted that appellant was only 23 years old, but he had a lengthy criminal history. The court denied probation and imposed the upper term on the attempted robbery charge. The court commented that appellant was "a bad man," so "the aggravated term" was appropriate.
Page 33
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.